Esto es un texto de prueba para el video de una resección endoscópica mucosa que me gustaría insertar.
Dear Editor:
We greatly appreciate Carlson & Hew comment on the article “Underwater versus conventional EMR of large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: no clarity on the role of submucosal injection”, because it brings out the issue of combining strategies within underwater endoscopic mucosal resection. As these authors say, Binmoeller et al. described the UEMR technique as a resection strategy in which, the floating effect allows the creation of a resection plane in the submucosal layer, without the need for submucosal injection1.
Esto es un texto de prueba para el video de una resección endoscópica mucosa que me gustaría insertar.
Dear Editor:
We greatly appreciate Carlson & Hew comment on the article “Underwater versus conventional EMR of large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: no clarity on the role of submucosal injection”, because it brings out the issue of combining strategies within underwater endoscopic mucosal resection. As these authors say, Binmoeller et al. described the UEMR technique as a resection strategy in which, the floating effect allows the creation of a resection plane in the submucosal layer, without the need for submucosal injection1.
Being strict, in no momment did Binmoeller exclude the possibility of adapting different technical aspects of the procedure depending on the circumstances. Thus, in the original description, Binmoeller used 15 mm snares for the procedures, marking the edges using APC or different current modes (Dry Cut) (1), that are not necessarily used nowadays. Not to mention the possibility of adding a cap to facilitate the technique, just as is currently being published (2). So, if we stick to the original description of the technique, all these circumstances would not be considered underwater EMR.